Re: RFS: libsmf
A review:
The first 3 symbols in the symbols file look like they might be
internal symbols that should not be exported, is that the case?
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility
The SONAME should not be added to the -dev or utils packages. I'd
recommend naming the utils package smf-utils
Why does the -dev package depend on libc-dev?
I find it interesting that upstream uses readline (GPL) rather than
editline (BSD).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to:
- References:
- RFS: libsmf
- From: Josue Abarca <jmaslibre@debian.org.gt>