On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 06:43:07PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:23:25AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >> Dominik George <dev@naturalnik.de> (26/02/2010): > >> > OK, as it is done in postinst, there does not seem to be a > >> > difference to my current chown setup. dpkg-statoverride will make > >> > sure that the permissions are set everytiem the file is > >> > re-installed, but chown in postinst will as well ... > >> > >> And will nuke possible local changes? > > > > Erm, surely the script would check with dpkg-statoverride --list > > before setting the permissions, as described in Policy 10.9.1 :) > > I'm pretty sure KiBi was referring to the chown method :) Oh. Right. Sowwy :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@space.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 If this sentence were in Chinese, it would say something else.
Attachment:
pgptUGA855oAu.pgp
Description: PGP signature