Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto, detailed below.
It'd be great if someone would give me an early Christmas present by
uploading it.
There are a few warnings generated when building the package:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 could be
avoided if "debian/libmosquittopp0/usr/lib/libmosquittopp.so.0"
were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its
symbols).
The dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 is added by g++ automatically, it
isn't part of the build itself. I believe this warning is a false
positive.
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package python-mosquitto: unused
substitution variable ${python:Versions}
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package python-mosquitto: unused
substitution variable ${python:Provides}
I'm told that these are safe to ignore if python-support is being
used, which is the case.
* Package name : mosquitto
Version : 0.9.1-1
Upstream Author : Roger Light <roger@atchoo.org>
* URL : http://mosquitto.org/
* License : BSD
Section : net
It builds these binary packages:
libmosquitto0 - MQTT version 3.1 client library
libmosquitto-dev - MQTT version 3.1 client library, development files
libmosquittopp0 - MQTT version 3.1 client C++ library
libmosquittopp-dev - MQTT version 3.1 client C++ library, development files
mosquitto - MQTT version 3 compatible message broker
mosquitto-pub - Mosquitto command line publish client
mosquitto-sub - Mosquitto command line subscribe client
python-mosquitto - MQTT version 3.1 client library, python bindings
The upload would fix these bugs: 605319
My motivation for maintaining this package is that I'm the upstream
author and want to make it easier for people to get access to it.
- Hide quoted text -
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mosquitto
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mosquitto/mosquitto_0.9.1-1.dsc
Happy Christmas!
Thanks,
Roger
Reply to: