[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: sonic



On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:59:15PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> This is no reason to declare the package as an native one.

Yes - a native package is one that does not make sense outside the
Debian distribution.

Your package builds in a clean chroot, but the binary packages
produced have a few lintian warnings :

    I: libsonic0: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
    I: libsonic0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libsonic0.so.0.1.8
    W: libsonic0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libsonic0-0
    I: libsonic0-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short

You should run lintian -iI sonic*.changes and fix those.

Cheers,

-- 
Etienne Millon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: