Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "klatexformula". * Package name : klatexformula Version : 3.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Philippe Faist <firstname.lastname@example.org> * URL : http://klatexformula.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : tex It builds these binary package: klatexformula - GUI to easily get an image from a LaTeX formula or equation The upload would fix these bugs: 551335 I started working on the package about year ago and worked already with a sponsor on this, who however lost the interest in the package. I would really like to see the package in Debian, as it proviedes an nice GUI for typing equations and drag them as pictures into presentations. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/klatexformula - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/klatexformula/klatexformula_3.2.1-1.dsc or http://bitbucket.org/tobias.winchen/klatexformula_debian/downloads/ The build system has changed upstream and now Lintian gives some warnings: W: klatexformula: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libklfbackend.so.3.2 usr/lib/libklfbackend.so W: klatexformula: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libklfapp.so.3.2 usr/lib/libklfapp.so W: klatexformula: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libklftools.so.3.2 usr/lib/libklftools.so W: klatexformula: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libklfapp3.2 libklfbackend3.2 libklftools3.2 As I understand it I could solve these by creating three library packages and accompaninging development packages. However, as klatexformula is a small program and I doubt that there is interest in the lib and -dev packages, can these simply be ignored (and overriden), or is it preferred to have the "full" set of lib and dev packages? Kind regards Tobias Winchen -- IM (Jabber): email@example.com
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.