Re: Bug merge fail owner mismatch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-11-01 14:29, Daniel Stender wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> it would be good idea to merge my ITP with the "original" RFP, but my attempt to merge two bugs failed:
>
> <cut>
> Bug#568920: RFP: didjvu -- encoding into DjVu with layers separation
> Bug#601781: ITP: didjvu - DjVu encoder with foreground/background layer separation using Gamera
> Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
> Values for `owner' don't match:
> #568920 has `';
> #601781 has `Daniel Stender <daniel@danielstender.com>'
> </cut>
>
> What could I do for housekeeping here, "forcemerge"?
>
> ---
> http://www.danielstender.com/granthinam/
> PGP key: 1654BD9C
>
>
Hi
forcemerge works (though remember that forcemerge x y is not the same as
forcemerge y x).
Alternatively you can take ownership of the RFP bug first and then do
the merge (which can be done in the same email). Though...
> "Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:"
merge is rather pedantic, so you may have to do other changes first as
well (I cannot remember if the "title" is a part of the "bug state" or not).
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=N3du
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: