Hi Matthew On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:01:39PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > The package is really, *really* not Lintian clean, and claiming otherwise in > the RFS was bad form. All those CVS dirs in the resulting package > definitely need gutting, and you'll want to look into why geshi is still > getting installed in the package, given that it appears to be correctly > depended on. I checked it again and: * Repackage upstream source to remove CVS dirs and contact upstream about it. * Remove geshi from the installed package in debian/rules and re-check that is using the one already packaged in Debian Also i send the DM [1]application email (i'm waiting for my advocation email) and add the DM-Upload-Allowed field, hope it's ok for you. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2010/10/msg00020.html > Apart from that, though, it builds, installs, and runs pgfouine --help, so > you're over most of the big humps. Currently i'm using it and it seems completely stable. Thanks -- Luis http://eviled.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature