[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: emerald

Hi Adam,

> I reviewed it, and it appears to work just fine.

Thank you for a review.

> There's a lot of warnings about gratuitous linkage of unnecessary libs, but
> that's mostly an upstreamish problem.

I was thinking of patching this, but maybe for the next revision...

> The only big issue I noticed is that the package is targetted at
> experimental instead of unstable -- is there any reason for that?

Experimental is targeted because of the freeze and this will be in
new. If you think that unstable is acceptable, I'm glad to change?


Reply to: