Re: dfsg bit in the package name
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Ludovico Cavedon <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Paul Wise <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I personally can't think of any situation where ~dfsg is useful.
> If I want to rebuild a package including the non-free bits, I could
> just remove the "~dfsg" from the version and have it win over the one
> the official repository.
Hmm, I guess that makes sense. Usually I want the opposite though, the
package without non-free bits should win over the one with non-free