Re: RFS: xpdf (updated package)
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:29:07AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> In terms of xpdf performance, can those concerned please try files that
> they consider big with the poppler-ized version and compare that to the
> original xpdf so we can actually quantify the impact (if there even is
> one). Speculating doesn't really get us anywhere. We need a
> quantified impact.
I have not tested the poplerized version of xdpf yet. Because you
mentioned speculations, let me in turn say that I have not seen
your answers yet on the questions I raised in my first mail (besides
some speculations, of course). Rogério mentioned some facts (thanks!)
but could you please provide more details?
> Again, I want to upload this package to experemental first for testing
> purposes; and large file handling would be a very good set of tests.
Yes, this sounds reasonable.
--
Stanislav
Reply to: