Re: "Breaks" or "Conflicts"?

["Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <jackyf.devel@gmail.com>]

Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> So, the _real_ relationship is: the conjunction (B(old) + C(new)) breaks
> A and A-doc (to a point where A-doc ends-up deconfigured).
> 
> Very clearly, C (new) must declare a "Conflicts" or a "Breaks" against B
> (< new). But which one is the good choice?
> 
Conflicts should be declared only in case of file conflicts. If, as I see,
it's the case of 'doesn't work with' then use Breaks.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer