Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: otf-ipaexfont (NEW)
2010/3/1 Hideki Yamane <email@example.com>:
> It could be renamed but, in spec, OpenType font has its extension either .otf
> or .ttf, both of Okay.
>>>Fonts containing TrueType outlines may have either .OTF or .TTF, depending on
>>>the desire for backward compatibility on older systems or with previous versions
>>>of the font.
> And upstream chose .TTF for that.
It also says this:
> In all cases, fonts with only CFF data (no TrueType outlines) always have an .OTF extension.
I think this could be added as a check to the pkg-fonts review pages.
I guess fontlint would be the right place to add such a check, any
volunteers for the task?