Re: RFS: slimrat
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: RFS: slimrat
- From: Michal Čihař <michal@cihar.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:29:28 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20100201102928.018c98c2@nutt.cihar.com>
- In-reply-to: <9bfa9ae1001261714r17e7d844i66fdb8755fbe1755@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <b4892f8e1001200301mfd969d6j800fc9b58fdf51a5@mail.gmail.com> <20100121120544.16d175a4@rincewind.suse.cz> <b4892f8e1001210851leba134dlaa4e587307e085c5@mail.gmail.com> <20100121193523.GE4308@belanna.comodo.priv.at> <b4892f8e1001220402k44fe95d8x60cb2699d9b9ac4a@mail.gmail.com> <20100125150129.051a17c1@rincewind.suse.cz> <b4892f8e1001250759y623dec7brbd36da62e1d8082@mail.gmail.com> <20100125174925.1a775e6f@rincewind.suse.cz> <9bfa9ae1001261714r17e7d844i66fdb8755fbe1755@mail.gmail.com>
Hi
Dne Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:14:43 -0200
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" <naoliv@gmail.com> napsal(a):
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Michal Čihař <nijel@debian.org> wrote:
> > You should use ${source:Version} for arch:all packages as these can not
> > be binnmued.
>
> This is true when we are declaring a dependency of an arch:any package
> to an arch:all.
> But for slimrat, there are two arch:all packages only (arch:all
> depending on arch:all).
> In practice (and while we don't have binNMUs of arch:all packages),
> the result will be the same if using ${source:Version} or
> ${binary:Version}, won't it?
Yes it will be. At least for now.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: