Re: Re: RFS: pynagram
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 06:52, Umang <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Please make the synopsis with no leading article (as requested in the
>> best practices in the Developer's Guide). That would make the synopsis:
>> simple anagram game
> Do I need to make a new package (i.e. 0.3.3-2 and upload that then post an
> RFS again), or do I do that only for the next release?
Please don't: just re-upload the -1 revision (ie don't increase
debian/changelog for no valid reason)
Reasoning: you're still releasing the first package, so there's no
"difference" with previous uploaded packages (what matters is what was
uploaded to debian ftp-archive, not mentors).
In any case, do what your sponsor asks (when you'll find one), since
probably you'll get one from debian-python, the above statement is
what we usually require.
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi