On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:05:55 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Sven Joachim wrote: > > > On 2009-09-07 12:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > >> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though. > > > > Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS. > > As Neil would have pointed out if he were still subscribed to -mentors, > DEB_BUILD_* is almost always the wrong choice, otherwise it will cross-build > incorrectly. > > -- > Felipe Sateler > Is there any documentation about this ? Why is it a wrong choice when you want to create a package from sources for a specific architecture ? Regards, Laurent -- Laurent Guignard, Registered as user #301590 with the Linux Counter Site : http://www.famille-guignard.org Blog : http://blog.famille-guignard.org Projet : http://sicontact.sourceforge.net GULL de Villefranche sur Saône : http://www.cagull.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature