Il giorno sab, 05/09/2009 alle 10.03 +0200, Pietro Battiston ha scritto: > Il giorno sab, 05/09/2009 alle 09.50 +0200, Pietro Battiston ha scritto: > > Il giorno mer, 19/08/2009 alle 19.19 +0200, Patrick Matthäi ha scritto: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Pietro Battiston schrieb: > > > > Rogério's mail ([0]) gave me desire to insist. > > > > > > > > Now I'm being much more clearer and short: a (not so unpopular) package > > > > (Denemo) is unmaintained. It has bugs and a very old version packaged, > > > > which upstream strongly suggests to avoid. I repackaged it from scratch: > > > > last upstream version (and changes aren't really minor, also w.r.t. > > > > packaging), and dropped CDBS. > > > > > > > > To the first mail I send, the maintainer answers, after 15 days, "I have > > > > no time to comment". > > > > To the second mail, where I link the package I made, no answer after 18 > > > > days. > > > > > > > > What should I do? > > > > > > > > "Just wait" would also be an admissible response... but _how much time_? > > > > And then? > > > > > > Please bug this package with your patch attached (or .dsc). > > > If he does not act within 10 days on it you could create an NMU, I am > > > willed to sponsor it, if there are no bigger misstakes in your packaging. > > > > Done: see [0], get the .dsc at [1]. > > > > About why 0.8.8 was more problematic than 0.8.6, details are in > > debian/patches/08_git_autogen_config.dpatch . > > > > [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513285 > > [1]: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/denemo/denemo_0.8.8-1.1.dsc > > > > Removed, there was a lintian warning introduced with the last > modification, please wait a little until I upload a fixed version. Done, please try now, sorry for flooding. Pietro
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente