In <[🔎] 30e395780906121522i273d74b8qe6bf4f35198e480e@mail.gmail.com>, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: >Now it is not lintian clean. If I have the usr/lib/libiulib.so.0.0.0 >libiulib.so.0 symlinks in libiulib0, then I get: > >W: libiulib0: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libiulib.so.0.0.0 >usr/lib/libiulib.so > >If I put them in the -dev, I get: > >E: libiulib0: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib usr/lib/libiulib.so.0 >usr/lib/libiulib.so.0.0.0 libiulib.so.0 > >How do I fix this? The (unversioned, build-time use only) symlink libiulib.so -> libiulib.so.0.0.0 needs to be in libiulib-dev package. The (major- versioned) symlink libiulib.so.0 -> libiulib.so.0.0.0 needs to be in the libuilib0 package. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.