|
Hi, the package I'm working on (eprover) contains LaTeX documentation that is already compiled into PDF in the upstream tarball. However, since Debian Policy states that the preferred format is HTML, I was thinking about generating documentation also in HTML. I found a nice program, tex4ht, which seems to work quite well. I have a few question though: 1) First, is it a good idea at all to create HTML documentation this way, or is the PDF file enough? If yes then: 2) The HTML page is quite large, ~300k, about the same size as the PDF. Should I put it into a separate package or not? 3) Should I state 'tex4ht' in build dependencies and rebuild the documentation in debian/rules, or should I create it in advance and include it as a diff/patch? (This might be a bit complicated as the generated documentation contains PNG images of formulas, which diff/patch tools don't like). Thanks for your opinions/advices. Best regards, Petr |