[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fuppes: Package Names and the Separation of a Project into Packages



On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 02:18:22PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hm I'd first consider the size of each of the plugin packages. If
> they're relatively small you could consider grouping them, seems
> like that it is already somewhat done in core, database, encoder,
> metadata, ... if these are not depending on each other it could be
> a sensible choice. If they're really small all in one is ok as
> well.

Equally important in this decision is the size and number of
dependencies for each package. While the packages themselves may be
small, the fine-grained split may have been intended more to avoid
the user installing a ton of dependencies for particular features
they didn't need anyway.
-- 
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); PGP(9E8DFF2E4F5995F8FEADDC5829ABF7441FB84657);
SMTP(fungi@yuggoth.org); IRC(fungi@irc.yuggoth.org#ccl); ICQ(114362511);
AIM(dreadazathoth); YAHOO(crawlingchaoslabs); FINGER(fungi@yuggoth.org);
MUD(fungi@katarsis.mudpy.org:6669); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); }


Reply to: