Re: RFS: libplist (Adopted, updated package)
Le mercredi 25 novembre 2009 à 18:03 +0000, Bradley Smith a écrit :
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:10:59 +0100
> Julien Lavergne <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Yes, strangely, the symbols are different if the package is build on
> > i386 or on amd64.
> > I removed the symbols file until I find why there is such behavior. The
> > actual version on mentors should build fine now.
> C++ symbols always differ between arches. You either need specific symbols
> for every arch, or you will need to drop them altogether.
Ok, thanks for the precision.
I'll try to add at least my arch to follow symbols evolution.