[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: netdiscover (updated package)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

William Vera schrieb:
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3beta6+20080409-5
> of my package "netdiscover".
> 
> It builds these binary packages:
> netdiscover - active/passive network address scanner using arp requests
> netdiscover-dbg - active/passive network address scanner using arp
> requests (debug)
> 
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
> 
> The upload would fix these bugs: 543853
> 
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netdiscover
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> main contrib non-free
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netdiscover/netdiscover_0.3beta6+20080409-5.dsc
> 
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Hello,

thanks for taking care of the package. Your package is okay, but lintian
says:

I: netdiscover: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
usr/share/man/man8/netdiscover.8.gz:5
I: netdiscover: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
usr/share/man/man8/netdiscover.8.gz:70
I: netdiscover: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
usr/share/man/man8/netdiscover.8.gz:73
I: netdiscover: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign
usr/share/man/man8/netdiscover.8.gz:103
I: netdiscover: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/sbin/netdiscover als also
I: netdiscover: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/sbin/netdiscover
eletronic electronic

While you are fixed another manpage error, may you please also fix those?

- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
 Patrick Matthäi
 GNU/Linux Debian Developer

E-Mail: pmatthaei@debian.org
        patrick@linux-dev.org

Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAksMGdgACgkQ2XA5inpabMc8MQCfVbxej0OzwybN5Xxg53fwgj30
m7gAn3Ta/aw17Z4W41FwgxJXdniNTfpl
=cP+H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: