Re: RFS: pidgin-skype
On Tue, Nov 03 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Di, 03 Nov 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> provide assurances that the SVG no longer exists at all. You probably
>> also should be generating the icons on the fly from the SVG using
>> inkscape as you build the package.
> What??? That is a joke, right?
> If everyone would start using inkscape for building icons that are pre-made
> then ... well, build-deps are exploding.
> I consider this wrong behaviour.
No, it would be the right behaviour. Even of gcc, cpp, and ldd
are huge, we do not complain about building non-source files while
building binary packages.
> Finally to the OP: BTW, you have to cut out the brain of upstream
> and include a digitized version of it in your source, becasue that one
> is the preferred version of editing, and the real source.
> Guys you are getting ridicuolous.
Actually, your posting is perhaps the only one that meets this
criteria. What is so wrong about insisting on the preferred form of
Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you
do it. Gandhi
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C