On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 07:49 +0200, Walter Franzini wrote: > Reinhard Tartler <siretart@debian.org> writes: > > [...] > > > I've had a brief look at the package, and have a few comments on it: > > Thank's for taking the time to review the package. > > > - the orig.tar.gz you've used is content-identical but not > > bit-identical. This means that the archive will reject the upload > > because the checksums do not match. > > I'll regenerate the .changes using the proper archive. > > The problem may be related to the procedure used to produce the upstream > tarball, it is created with file ownership different from root.root and > git-buildpackage /probably/ is unable to reproduce it exactly. Peter, You might like to consider re-spinning your Aegis release as a tarball with everything in it root:root/uid 0 - the maintainer packaging your software in Debian wants to recreate it from a different VCS, and that toolchain has some bugs/limits. -Rob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part