[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#543741: ettercap: should this package be orphaned?



On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 10:48 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> *If* this package becomes orphaned, I'll happily sponsor someone willing to
> maintain it. Maybe there's someone on debian-mentors who would be willing to
> adopt it if it's orphaned. Any volunteers?

I'm taking a look at it, although even at grabbing the build-deps I seem
to running across something:

zakame@perlis:~/pkg/e/ettercap$ sudo aptitude build-dep ettercap
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information      
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done  
Unable to satisfy the build-depends: Build-Dependslibncurses-dev.Unable
to satisfy the build-depends: Build-Dependslibltdl3-dev.Unable to
satisfy the build-depends: Build-Dependslibncurses-dev.Unable to satisfy
the build-depends: Build-Dependslibltdl3-dev.The following NEW packages
will be installed:
  libnet1{a} libnet1-dev libpcap0.8-dev libpcre3-dev libpcrecpp0{a} 
0 packages upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
Need to get 526kB/734kB of archives. After unpacking 2171kB will be
used.


-- 
Zak B. Elep -- 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1  F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D
  I like the idea of 256 bits, though: 32 for the (Unicode) character
leaves room for 224 Bucky bits, which ought to be enough for anyone.
                        -- Roland Hutchinson, in alt.folklore.computers

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: