[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rules file and missing dh_shlibdeps



On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 06:20:48PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Friday 10,July,2009 05:58 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > If your package is architecture dependent, you should keep the call to
> > sh_libdeps in case the upstream situation ever changes. If it's Arch:
> > any, you can safely remove the call.
> 'Arch: any' means architecture dependent. Perhaps you meant 'Arch: all'?

Yes; I doubt it's the last time I'll make that mistake. Thanks.




-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire

1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3  A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: