Re: Re-RFS-ing

To: ultrafredde@gmail.com
Cc: debian-mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Re-RFS-ing
From: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:36:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 8b2d7b4d0906040236q7258a8afy9293b0ed80ac3bca@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 690f5ac90906040229l4f715c52x7745b4fbdb8d8221@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 690f5ac90906040229l4f715c52x7745b4fbdb8d8221@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Federico,

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:29, Federico Hernandez <ultrafredde@gmail.com> wrote:
> What are the policies on resubmitting a RFS? How long should one wait? I

there is no definite time; rule of thumb will say "wait a couple of
week, then reply to the original RFS to renew it". You may also
address different people/groups, for example: if you package a perl
lib, ask perl team to sponsor it.

> tried to find some information on this looking through the archives but
> couldn't find anything.

Strange, it's quite a common question...

Regards,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re-RFS-ing
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>

References:
- Re-RFS-ing
  - From: Federico Hernandez <ultrafredde@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re-RFS-ing
Next by Date: Re: Re-RFS-ing
Previous by thread: Re-RFS-ing
Next by thread: Re: Re-RFS-ing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread