[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: alarm-clock (updated package, adoption, targetted for experimental)



Hi,

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:10:31PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> 2009/5/13 Ryan Niebur <ryanryan52@gmail.com>:
> > For experimental because it's a rewrite in C and doesn't yet have all
> > of the features of the python version. Upstream recommended leaving
> > the python version in unstable for now.
> >
> 
> I thought upstream was dead..... Is it same upstream????
> 

no clue. :P
same copyright holder as the python version in unstable has, but that
doesn't say much..

> Also with python version CPU usage would go to 100% when playing music
> for alarm. That's why I've stopped using it. Does this happen with C
> version as well? Otherwise I'll try it out.
> 

it doesn't look like it does..
and sorry for taking so long to respond.

Cheers,
Ryan

-- 
_________________________
Ryan Niebur
ryanryan52@gmail.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: