Re: On the quest for automated QA checks

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: On the quest for automated QA checks
From: Paul Gevers <paul@climbing.nl>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 22:27:37 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 49FCACB9.8090802@climbing.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090502194256.GA6434@ime.usp.br>
References: <a1dfbff90903260721o20b8502aw616c6fb25ae68475@mail.gmail.com> <20090326160153.664b75ea@rincewind.suse.cz> <[🔎] 200905021803.52884@proffe.kibibyte.se> <[🔎] 86ecb3c70905021032s2bc9a1ceid293b06869ea446e@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20090502194256.GA6434@ime.usp.br>

> Well, more tests could be included (suggestions), but something along
> the lines of the package "elida" would be nice to have (disclaimer: I
> still don't have used this package).

I think most tests could be included in Lintian. Please file a wishlist
bug against Lintian.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: RFS: mpview
  - From: Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: mpview
  - From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <dmitrij.ledkov@gmail.com>
- On the quest for automated QA checks (was: Re: RFS: mpview)
  - From: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>

Prev by Date: Re: dh_installdirs?
Next by Date: RFS: udav
Previous by thread: On the quest for automated QA checks (was: Re: RFS: mpview)
Next by thread: Re: On the quest for automated QA checks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread