On lördagen den 2 maj 2009, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > 2009/5/2 Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@debian.org>: > > On torsdagen den 26 mars 2009, Michal Čihař wrote: > >> Dne Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:21:29 +0100 > >> > >> Adam Ziaja <adam@ziaja.name> napsal(a): > >> > The package appears to be lintian clean. > >> > >> It does not: > >> > >> I: mpview source: debian-watch-file-is-missing > >> W: mpview source: dh-clean-k-is-deprecated > >> W: mpview source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.8.1) > > > > Hang on a second. When does mentors.d.n put "The package appears to be > > lintian clean" in the RFS template? When lintian reports no errors or > > warnings, or as soon as there are no errors? > > I think it's not running lintian at all, that text is just boilerplate > which assumes mentees did run lintian..... Of course; mentors.d.n doesn't build anything, for obvious reasons. Seems to me that that assertion should be omitted until someone implements a step where mentees have to confirm that they have indeed run lintian and that it didn't report any errors or warnings. -- Magnus Holmgren holmgren@debian.org Debian Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.