Hi,I got this reply back from upstream author. I know close to nothing about programming, so I'm looking for a bit assistance here. Thanks.
\r
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]
- From: Nedko Arnaudov <nedko@arnaudov.name>
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:00:52 +0300
- Message-id: <87prfqjp7v.fsf@usbix.spacelabs.org>
- In-reply-to: <49D27095.1080403@gmail.com> (Grammostola Rosea's message of "Tue\, 31 Mar 2009 21\:35\:49 +0200")
- References: <49D27095.1080403@gmail.com>
Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola@gmail.com> writes: > From: Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> > Subject: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found > To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:37:24 +0100 > Resent-From: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:26:14 +0200 > Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >> > Grammostola Rosea wrote: >> > >> >> GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule >> >> >> > ^ >> > This space should be removed. >> > >> > >> Where can I find this line? I use cdbs. >> >> \r > > CDBS handles GCONF properly but this line is executed long before CDBS > gets any chance to use the debhelper gconf support - it looks like > upstream as it is still being called by make. Yes, gconf is called by make. The suse packager requested the --disable-schemas-install configure option and this made it for him. If you have better suggestion, do it. -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>Attachment: pgpszj9dkxm9V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---