Re: Lintian override or replicate files
Ludovico Cavedon <ludovico.cavedon@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> There are some files like:
> -man page
> -.desktop file
> -menu file
> -menu icon
> which are architecture-independent. However, if you put them inside the
> "-data" package, lintian will complain (e.g. binary-without-manpage,
> desktop-command-not-in-package, ...)
Though those files are architecture-independent, they are more tightly
bound to the proper packaging of the program than mere “data”, IMO.
Lintian is apparently designed with the same philosophy.
I think it's best if they go in the package along with the program.
Reserve the ‘foo-data’ package for data which is only for use *by* the
program, as opposed to data that other systems (manpage system,
desktop environment) need when the program is installed.
> What is currently considered best practice:
> -put them in the -data package and add lintian overrides
> -leave them in the binary file, as they are small?
The latter, IMO.
--
\ “It's a good thing we have gravity or else when birds died |
`\ they'd just stay right up there. Hunters would be all |
_o__) confused.” —Steven Wright |
Ben Finney
Reply to: