On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:04:58PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > Why do you think the information in README.Debian is relevant to anyone > > installing the package? > > > > Also, some typos in README.Debian: > > Intrebid > > wih > > upsream > > Sure, that particular README.Debian is somehow superfluous here (and could be > removed in the next release, Jonathan: hint, hint, but no rush or you will > need some jumbo sponsors ;-), since it duplicates descriptions given in the > patches' headers. Debian.source (to be refered for package-specific practices > when someone intends to NMU your package) and REAME.Debian-source (dfsg > repackaged source) are not relevant also. I lobbied hard for keeping README.Debian in last time but I can see my inexperience showing again :-) On review you are right, it duplicates the patch headers - my aim was to keep the user informed, who will never see them, but there isn't any real need. Taking it out will also fix the typos elegantly ;-) but no, it's not worth another upload, so it can wait until next time. > I also had a look at 10-debian-versions-511364.dpatch and > 15-honour-proxy-512902.dpatch which are fine. Thanks. Uploaded. Great, thanks! -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature