[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Introducing spurious revisions during sponsorship considered harmful (by some of us)



On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:49:10PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 23:46, Martin Meredith <mez@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >> * Martin Meredith [Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:05:11 +0000]:
> >>
> >> Hey Martin,
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >> > >   * history: I haven't seen this argument fly be in (this and other
> >> > >     instances of) this discussion, but the answer is that the proper
> >> > >     place to record that you had an extra and fatal space in your rules
> >> > >     file is your VCS. (And FWIW, I think much of this discussion would
> >> > >     go away if sponsorship was VCS-based rather than dsc+diff.gz based.)
> >>
> >> > That actually sounds like an interesting project. Something I might start
> >> > hacking on.
> >>
> >> Uhm, what needs hacking, exactly? The sponsoree just says "Repo for the
> >> package is at $URL", no? Or do you mean some kind of integration with
> >> mentors.debian.net?
> >
> > Tools to make things easier to grab stuff from $repo :) etc etc... and a good
> 
> debcheckout from devscripts?
> 
> > workflow documentation... maybe some other stuff :D
> 
> If you really wanna help this part of Debian, I think you might have a
> look at debexpo, and have it up&running soon.

Will have a look at it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: