Re: RFS: hexec (second try)

[Alexander Block <ablock@blocksoftware.net>]

George Danchev wrote:
> I have the impression that I've left some impression that I had intended to 
> sponsor that package. Just to let prospective sponsors know that they are 
> welcome to review and probably upload it, if found to be useful for anyone. 
> Currently I don't any notion how it could be useful for me. But, yes the 
> package seems to be in good shape and I hope the disambiguity is now in place 
> and human time not wasted ;-)
>
> Perhaps some `salt' provided by Alexander would help prospective sponsors to 
> better understand and find it useful.
>
> [1] well, as we all know, the initial upload is not the end of the story
Thanks for this clarification George.

What I will do in the next days/weeks is to prepare some more
documentation and usage examples for hexec. I understand that
it's hard to see any possible usage in the package if there is no
good documentation and no examples available ;)