On Wednesday 03 December 2008 16:50:08 Michal Čihař wrote: > > - dget > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/librcd/librcd_0.1.11-2.dsc > > Anyway few comments for package: > > FTBFS: > # Add here commands to configure the package. > ./autogen.sh > ./autogen.sh: line 11: test: argument expected > find: `/usr/X11R6/bin': No such file or directory > find: `/usr/X11R6/bin': No such file or directory > find: `/usr/X11R6/bin': No such file or directory > find: `/usr/X11R6/bin': No such file or directory > ./autogen.sh: autoconf: using > ./autogen.sh: automake: using > ./autogen.sh: aclocal: using > ./autogen.sh: libtoolize: using > ./autogen.sh: autoheader: using > ./autogen.sh: line 66: --copy: command not found > autogen.sh: exited by previous error(s), return code was 127 > make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 > > (Full log is here: <http://tmp.cihar.com/librcd_0.1.11-2_amd64.build>) > > debian/rules: > > - What is reason for version=... magic on top? > - Please remove commented out things. > - Also you could use more of debhelber 7 capabilities... > > debian/*.dirs: > > None of them is IMHO needed. > > debian/changelog: > > - You should close an ITP bug you open for new package. > - There is no need to include upstream changelog here > (dh_installchangelogs should install the upstream one anyway). > > debian/control: > > - Library package should include soname in name, eg. librcd0 > - Please use current standards version. > - Please create better description, especially long one. I fix all of this bugs, but don't understand what meen - Also you could use more of debhelber 7 capabilities...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.