Re: A little question of a license
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
<leo@alaxarxa.net> wrote:
> could be in main? (so is dfsg)
Yes.
> I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something unclear
> to me. Something as the classical licenses are clear, but this custom makes
> me crazy.
It is just the 3-clause BSD license with references to the University
of California and the warranty disclaimer removed. Compare it with
/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: