Hi Dne Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:04:15 +0200 Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de> napsal(a): > I have uploaded a fixed package to mentors.debian.net. - why have you kept configure-stamp target? also remove configure from .PHONY - what is reason for commented out dh_* command in debian/rules > > - also license information in debian/copyright does not seem to be > > sufficient, you should be more detailed (or use new machine readable > > format, see http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat) > > Thanks a lot for this pointer. I've completely rewritten the copyright > file. One question though: Do I actually have to include the license > text for popular licenses? (in this case: GPL-any) Why do you use some random older revision of proposal? Yes you should include something like: License-Terms: GPL-2 On Debian and Debian-based systems, a copy of the GNU General Public License version 2 is available in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2. If you would use lintian, you would find it: $ lintian -I phpmyid_0.9-1_i386.changes I: phpmyid source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 7 E: phpmyid: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl (It shows also another problem in your package - mismatch between debian/compat and debhelper build dependency). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature