[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: caudium (updated package)



Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2008 11:17:44 schrieb Henrik Andreasson:
> Hilights from the changelog:
>    * New maintainer (Closes: #411675)
>    * Repacked caudium as architecture "all", thus caudium now uses
>      /usr/share/caudium as serverdir instead of
>      /usr/lib/caudium (Closes: #233331)
>    * New package translation Portuguese translation for debconf
>      messages, pt (Closes: #436553)
>    (I will also close 459931 after upload.)
Nice extract from the changelog.. but the actuall package on mentors miss 
this completly:
caudium (2:1.4.12-9) unstable; urgency=low

  * Merge caudium-foo on ftp-masters recommendation

 -- Henrik Andreasson <debian@han.pp.se>  Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:58:43 +0100

caudium (2:1.4.12-8) unstable; urgency=low

  * Fixes missing directory /var/log/caudium/localhost
  * Fixed permissions on /etc/caudium/servers
  * Fixed removeing dpkg-statoverrides at removal
  * Fixed chmod:ing cache files when upgrading

 -- Henrik Andreasson <debian@han.pp.se>  Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:35:15 +0100

caudium (2:1.4.12-7) unstable; urgency=low

  * remove upper limit for pike package in control file

 -- Henrik Andreasson <debian@han.pp.se>  Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:52:38 +0100

caudium (2:1.4.12-6) unstable; urgency=low

  * patch for apt-get as a client
  * fix the ssl-patch
  * fixed clean target

 -- Henrik Andreasson <debian@han.pp.se>  Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:52:48 +0100

---------------------
Furthermore there is a link in debian/copyright missing to the 
License /usr/share/common-licenses/...

Feel free to ping me again after this if fixed. Then I'll have another 
deeper look :)

Greetings
Winnie

-- 
 .''`.   Patrick Winnertz <winnie@debian.org>
:  :' :  GNU/Linux Debian Developer
`. `'`   http://www.der-winnie.de http://people.skolelinux.org/~winnie
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: