Re: RFS: ocropus (3nd try)
Hi Sandro,
2008/12/3 Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>:
> another thing about description: ocropus and ocropus-data have the
> same description: please clarify what's the purpose of -data package,
> just adding a simple paragraph at the bottom saying what the package
> contains.
Done.
>>> - please add a debian/watch file, "man uscan" for examples
>>
>> I don't think this is possible for software hosted by Google
>
> yes it's possible:
>
> version=3
> http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/downloads/list
> http://mpmath.googlecode.com/files/mpmath-(.*)\.zip
I've added one, but as I said before, I don't think it can work.
> - "mv Jamrules.old Jamrules" can be simply "rm Jamrules" (removing the
Done.
> no no, please move all dh_install<something> calls back in
> binary-arch, what I was suggesting is to remove them, since not needed
> at all; but I have to correct myself: only dh_installexamples is to
> be removed :) 'cause you have .install files
Done.
> have a look at [1] where "upsteam author", "copyright" and "license"
> are clearly separated, I expect the same for this package :)
>
> [1] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/c/checkgmail/current/copyright
Done.
> better if you state clearly it's Apache-2.0 and not only Apache-2
Done.
> that you have to name the copyright owner of those files in
> debian/copyright, but not as the main project holder; take this[2] as
> an example
Done.
I've uploaded the package again.
Thanks for your help
Regards
Jeff
Reply to: