Re: apt-proxy, apt-cacher & approx
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
> buggy. So we moved to using apt-cacher. Now we have loads of problems
> with apt-cacher as well (like currently, a recurring tzdata size
They will go away if you unlink the .deb file
I've been using apt-cacher for over a year and despite some bugs it has
worked fine. I've been tempted to give apt-cacher-ng a try, though.
> mismatch error). I was wondering if approx is any better than the other
> two. Did any of you try?
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.