Re: apt-proxy, apt-cacher & approx
On Monday 22 September 2008 15:20:20 Cameron Dale wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Goirand <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
> > buggy. So we moved to using apt-cacher. Now we have loads of problems
> > with apt-cacher as well (like currently, a recurring tzdata size
> > mismatch error). I was wondering if approx is any better than the other
> > two. Did any of you try?
> I have also experienced similar problems with both apt-proxy and
> -cacher. I am now using approx, and I can report no errors with it at
> all. It may be slightly slower, but that could be my imagination. I
> would definitely recommend approx.
I agree, approx has served myself well for quite some time.