On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:07:00 +0400, Al Nikolov wrote: > Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > > > Shouldn't devreference describe common used practices? It's not a > > policy, after all. > > OTOH, devreference is not a collection of common used practices (what is may > be sad), but a > > > overview of the recommended procedures and the available resources > > IMHO, whict is more suitable for such things inclusion into is Debian Wiki. AFAICT, using the proper suffix to describe *why* the upstream source tarball has been repacked *should* be in the *recommended* procedures. But, well, that's IMHO. David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature