> First, there is no "version 2.1" of the GNU General Public License. > Either the version is wrong, or the name is wrong, or both. oh, sure... I lost a "lesser".... > > Second, the copyright statement says "either version 2.1 of the > License" and then stops. This makes no sense: "either" implies > alternative options, but only one option is presented. ops.. bad copy and paste... thank you....