Re: RFS: scid2
I am not a DD and so cannot sponsor your package , but I have some
comments.
On 2008-06-30 21:47 +0200, W. van den Akker wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scid2".
What are its exact relationships to the scid package that already is in
Debian? You seem to share a few files with it, and I'm not convinced
that it really makes sense to have both installed. E.g. after
installing and removing scid2 I had to reinstall scid to get its
manpages back.
> The upload would fix these bugs: 465788
Uhm, really? Your upload does not fix the scid package.
> This package has 2 warnings in it.
> - scid2 source: changelog-should-mention-nmu (I placed NMU in the changelog)
Why did you do that? Don't you want to be the maintainer? If not you,
who else should it be?!
> - scid2 source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 3.6.24-1
> These 2 I cant get rid off. Someone any hints?
Yes, remove that NMU entry. But I noticed a few other problems:
> dpkg-source: warning: file scid2-3.6.24/debian/dirs has no final newline (either original or modified version)
Please add the missing newline.
> W: scid2: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/scid2/COPYING.gz
Don't install that file.
> W: scid2: maintainer-script-empty preinst
Remove the preinst, it does nothing.
> E: scid2: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/share/menu/scid2:6
Apparently a backslash is missing at the end of line 5.
Regards,
Sven
Reply to:
- References:
- RFS: scid2
- From: "W. van den Akker" <listsrv@wilsoft.nl>