Re: RFS: poco and poco-doc (updated packages) [3rd try]
George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net> writes:
> Ops, sorry bad row counting. I meant that
> $expected_name =~ s/([0-9])\.so\./$1-/; won't cope with well with name.so.1
It will indeed not match name.so.1 at all, which is intentional. :)
This implements the rule in library naming that says that a library named
libkrb5.so.3 should result in a package name of libkrb5-3 and not
libkrb53. It therefore only matches library names that end in a number.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: