On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:28:49PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Because LibTorrent is _not_ part of the rtorrent upstream tarball.
>
> Well, there's one reason to ship it separately then :). I thought libtorrent was
> part of the rtorrent source.
>
> > They're shipped individually [...]
>
> More reason then to keep them separate.
>
> >
> > Installing LibTorrent in [...]
>
> Ok then. I was not aware of that other software.
I agree that we should keep packages separate (although I never said the
contrary), but my opinion about the name of libtorrent10 package (name
of the package, _not_ the library) is still the same: what is the
rationale for a lib${PROTOCOL_NAME} _package_ name?
Are you assuming that only that library implementing the protocol will
be part of the distribution? Or should we consider it as a kind of
"favourite" library just because it was packaged before others?
Regards,
Cristian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature