Hello Paul, El mié, 16-04-2008 a las 08:33 +0800, Paul Wise escribió: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Francisco García <fgclaramonte@yahoo.es> wrote: > > > El mar, 15-04-2008 a las 22:32 +0800, Paul Wise escribió: > > > > #474020 should not have been closed with a -done message, instead you > > > should have closed it in the changelog of the new version. Leave it > > > as-is for now though. > > > > Yes, but since It wasn' a lynis bug, I decided to close it with a email. > > Perhaps I wasn't clear enough; there are two issues in that bug report: > > 1) please package the latest upstream of lynis (1.0.9 at the time) > 2) the warning due to a broken sources.list, which was marked as a > "side note" by the bug reporter > > #1 is still valid and #2 was invalid at the time. > > The appropriate action would have been to leave the bug open and add > something like this to the changelog: > > * New upstream release (Closes: #474020) > > No need to do this now though for just a wishlist bug, something to > keep in mind for the future though. Ok, I agree with you. It is the usual way for me. In other packages I do this as you say. > > > > What is the reason for adding the dnsutils suggests? > > > > I add dnsutils suggests because in /include/tests_networking script, it > > runs "dig" command, and this is included in dnsutils package. > > The dependency is not absolute or strong. > > So, according to Helmut Grohne suggestion, I decided to add a suggest > > dependency. > > Makes sense to me. > Should I upload your 1.1.1 package now or do you want to switch to > quilt (or dpatch). > Well, If you agree with me, I would like you upload the package, and I send my changes to upstream. Anyway if It is necesary in next release, I'll make the changes with dpatch. Thank you for your help. Francisco. -- Francisco M. García Claramonte <franciscomanuel.garcia@hispalinux.es> GPG: public key ID 556ABA51
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente