Re: RFS: uniconvertor
I demand that Andreas Wenning may or may not have written...
> On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 01:20 -0200, Mauro Lizaur wrote:
>> The binary name is uniconv, I think it should be uniconvertor
> The problem is, that inkscape directly uses the name "uniconv". If the
> executable is renamed to uniconvertor, inkscape won't pick its existence
> up. So should I change the package name to uniconvertor, and make uniconv
> also work (via symlink)? Or should I just keep the name as uniconv.
If it should be changed, I think that I'd choose to symlink it, file a bug
against inkscape, then (after lenny is released) kill the symlink and have
the package break or conflict with older (presently current) inkscape.
I'd probably go with what a DD says, though. :-)
| Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| + Output less CO2 => avoid massive flooding. TIME IS RUNNING OUT *FAST*.
Drop that pickle!