On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:46:31PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 16:30 schrieb Jean Parpaillon: > > Hi, > > I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the > > following statements: > > ---------------------- > > 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > > notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. > > > > 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright > > notice, this list of conditions, and the following disclaimer in the > > documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. > > > > 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this > > software must display the following acknowledgement: > > This product includes software developed at the University of > > Tennessee, Knoxville, Innovative Computing Laboratories. > > > > 4. The name of the University, the name of the Laboratory, or the > > names of its contributors may not be used to endorse or promote > > products derived from this software without specific written > > permission. > > -------------------- > > > > I've read DFSG and I'm not sure if items 3 and 4 are problematic. Can > > someone help me ? If it's not ok, may it be in contrib ? > > IANAL, but this license doesn't seem to allow modification, does it? Good point. Which brings us to the next point: this is really a question for -legal. I'm sending it there with this mail. :-) Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature