[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: QA Uploads



On 26/01/2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.dsc
> > Fairly intrusive but makes it build and fixes 2 important bugs.
> 
> debdiff between the old and new binary:
> File lists identical (after any substitutions)
> 
> Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
> ------------------------------------------------
> Depends: {+apache2.2-common,+} libc6 (>= [-2.3.6-6), libdb4.3 (>= 4.3.28-1), libexpat1 (>= 1.95.8), libruby1.8 (>= 1.8.4), libxmlrpc-c3, apache2-common (>= 2.0.50)-] {+2.7-1), libuuid1, libxmlrpc-c3+}
> Installed-Size: [-72-] {+124+}
> Maintainer: [-Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>-] {+Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>+}
> Version: [-2.2.1-2-] {+2.2.1-3+}
> 
> So the dependencies on libdb4.3, libexpat1, libruby1.8 vanished? Is that
> correct?

At least from a .so point of view:
Symbol diff:
------------
  ./usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_xmlrpc.so:
    @@ -1,13 +1,10 @@
       NEEDED      libxmlrpc.so.3
    +  NEEDED      libxmlrpc_util.so.3
       NEEDED      libxmlrpc_xmlparse.so.3
       NEEDED      libxmlrpc_xmltok.so.3
    +  NEEDED      libuuid.so.1
       NEEDED      librt.so.1
    -  NEEDED      libm.so.6
       NEEDED      libcrypt.so.1
    -  NEEDED      libnsl.so.1
       NEEDED      libpthread.so.0
       NEEDED      libdl.so.2
    -  NEEDED      libdb-4.3.so
    -  NEEDED      libexpat.so.1
       NEEDED      libc.so.6
    -  NEEDED      libruby1.8.so.1.8

Since the previous (-2) revision can't be rebuilt (FTBFS), I only
applied the CMakeLists.txt diff, and both (the rebuilt one and the
“Barry one”) binaries are the same. Could it be that these NEEDED
dependencies previously came from extra linking and/or from extra Libs
in pkgconfig files (or similar), now moved to Libs.private?

Note that xmlrpc-c is in a strange shape (build states), I'm contacting
seanius through private mail about that.

Cheers,

-- 
Cyril Brulebois

Attachment: pgpTi69FS8BI5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: